Please let Harry Potter die

 
  
[From Terry Mattingly's weekly column "On Religion" ]
 
Father Jonathan Tobias knows exactly what he will do when J.K. Rowling releases the final volume of the Harry Potter series.
 
 The family tradition is that he reads the entire book out loud to
his wife and two daughters. Then, when the final page has been turned,
they start debating what will happen next.
 
 Things will be different this time. However, the Eastern Orthodox
priest knows how he hopes the last act plays out. Unlike many other
ministers, Tobias doesn’t want Potter to renounce magic or to lose his
adolescent flaws. It would be awkward, he said, for the young wizard to
“fall to his knees and make the sign of the cross.” His suggestion is
simpler than that.
 
Rowling should let Potter die, because that is what tragic heroes do.
 
 “There is little decent tragedy around” in modern culture, said
Tobias, at his “Second Terrace” weblog. “There is a lot of irony, where
a non-heroic central character is pitched into the abyss of ambiguity.
There is a lot of farce, where burlesque mummers traipse around in
varying degrees of moral undress.
 
 “But tragedy? No. … We do not see the sense of the pollution of
evil, and its uncleanness. We have no immediate feeling of the
necessity to fix or to cleanse. And we haven’t seen much of a fable
where the story demanded, clearly, the surmounting and cleansing of
evil — even at the cost of real, hard sacrifice.”
 
Tobias is one voice in a global digital chorus debating this issue
at myriad websites with names like SwordOfGryffindor.com and
The-Leaky-Cauldron.org. Potter fans have, after all, purchased more
than 300 million copies of the six novels.
 
The faithful have been sweating ever since Jim Dale, the voice
behind the U.S. audio-book editions, claimed that the author had told
him Harry would die. Then Rowling stunned British television viewers by
revealing that she had tweaked the finale (the last word is “scar”) so
that “one character got a reprieve, but two die that I didn’t intend to
die.” And Harry Potter? She answered, “I can completely understand the
mentality of an author who thinks, ‘I’m going to kill him off because
after I’m dead and gone they won’t be able to bring back the
character.’"
 
 Podcasting guru Emerson Spartz of MuggleNet.com spoke for millions
when he said he couldn’t believe that Rowling would build her series
around a “kid whose life sucks and then he dies.”